Investigating the teaching and learning of quantum information science (QIS)

The Second Quantum Revolution provides an unprecedented opportunity to rethink and revitalize quantum education and workforce development. As one of the earliest active scholars in QIS education research, I was awarded the 2025 Boeing Quantum Creators Prize for my foundational role in incubating this new and thriving interdisciplinary research community.

My Ph.D. thesis (May 2025, CU Boulder): New paradigms in quantum education for the Second Quantum Revolution

Featured projects

  • Image of an optical atomic clock which I worked on in 2019-2020 (Sr1 in Jun Ye's group at CU Boulder).

    Expanding access to hands-on quantum instruction

    Hands-on experimentation with real quantum devices provides educational benefits no textbook can replicate. How can we deliver access to such opportunities to students beyond the highly-resourced research universities? We’re working on a replicable model at CSUSM and beyond.

    Advisors: Justin Perron and Ed Price,
    California State University San Marcos

    Associated publications:

    This is a new project — check back soon!

  • A student filling out a Scantron sheet

    Scalable assessment of QIS student learning

    How can we know whether our teaching is actually effective? We’re developing the Quantum Computing Conceptual Survey (QCCS) to compare student learning in postsecondary quantum computing courses across courses and institutions.

    Advisors: Bethany Wilcox and Steve Pollock,
    University of Colorado Boulder
    Gina Passante
    California State University Fullerton

    Associated publications
    J. Meyer, S. Pollock, B. Wilcox, G. Passante (2026). Assessing student learning in quantum computing: The challenging case of phase kickback. arXiv:2602.22388

    Formal validation paper coming soon! In the meantime, refer to my Ph.D. thesis for preliminary results from the first several pilot semesters

  • PION project logo

    Undergraduate physics identity formation

    How do undergraduate students, particularly women and gender minorities, develop and articulate physics identities at this formative juncture of their careers? The PION project interviewed dozens of CUWiP participants to understand their identity journeys. I am particularly interested in the role mentorship and leadership play in the formation of these identities.

    Advisors: Jessica Rosenberg and Nancy Holincheck

    George Mason University

    Associated publications

    In the works, anticipated shortly. In the meantime, check out the following cool papers by my collaborators on the project:

    https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.16770

    https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2025.pr.Akesson

    https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.20.010114

Additional research areas

  • A figure showing the interdisciplinary course listings of QIS courses (from Meyer et al., PRPER 2022).

    Benchmarking the state of QIS education

    Transforming quantum education starts with knowing the present landscape. What courses and degrees are being offered, and who can access them? What is the state of QIS education research?

    Associated publications

    J. Meyer, S. Goorney, T. Kushimo, Z. Seskir (2026). Resource Letter QIE-1: Research in quantum information education. Accepted to Am J Phys. arXiv:2606.06445

    J. Meyer, G. Passante, B. Wilcox (2024). Disparities in access to US quantum information education. Phys Rev PER (open access)

    J. Meyer, G. Passante, S. Pollock, B. Wilcox (2024). Introductory quantum information science coursework at US institutions: Content coverage. EPJ Quantum Technology (open access)

    J. Meyer, G. Passante, S. Pollock, B. Wilcox (2023). How media hype affects our physics teaching: A case study on quantum computing. The Physics Teacher 2023 (open access)

    J. Meyer, G. Passante, S. Pollock, B. Wilcox (2022). Today’s interdisciplinary quantum information classroom: Themes from a survey of quantum information science instructors. Phys Rev PER (open access)

  • Understanding how students think about quantum

    How do students reason about quantum information and quantum computing? And how can we help them build more expertlike problem-solving skills? These questions are key to developing research-based curricular materials and instructional strategies.

    Associated publications

    J. Meyer, G. Passante, S. Pollock, B. Wilcox. Investigating student interpretations of the differences between classical and quantum computers: Are quantum computers just analog classical computers? PERC Proc. 2022 (open access)

    J. Meyer, G. Passante, S. Pollock, M. Vignal, B. Wilcox. Investigating students’ strategies for interpreting quantum states in the context of an upper-division quantum computing class.
    PERC Proc. 2021 (open access)

  • Quantum ethics education

    Quantum technologies pose ethical and societal questions, from militarism to cybersecurity to workforce diversity. How can we prepare students to engage meaningfully with these issues in the workforce?

    Associated publications

    A. Schmidt et al. (2025). Current and future directions for responsible quantum technologies: A ResQT community perspective. arXiv:2509.19815

    J. Arrow, S. Marsh, J. Meyer. A holistic approach to quantum ethics education. Proc. IEEE QCE 2023 (open access)

    J. Meyer, N. Finkelstein, B. Wilcox. Ethics education in the quantum information science classroom: Exploring attitudes, barriers, and opportunities. Proc. ASEE Annual Conf 2022 (open access)